Postprandial glycemia should not be ignored
Original article:
Plasma glucose levels throughout the day and HbA1c interrelationship in
type 2 diabetes. Implications for treatment and monitoring of metabolic
control.
Bonora E, Calcaterra F, Lombardi S, Bonfante M, Formentini G, Bonadonna
RC, Muggeo M. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(12): 2023–9.
Summary
The current study was designed to assess the value of commonly used
parameters in establishing glycemic control of type 2 diabetic patients.
The authors wanted to determine whether HbA1c does indeed mirror changes
in daily plasma glucose levels. Their aim was to investigate the extent of
plasma glucose excursions after meals and the relationships between plasma
glucose levels at different times of the day and with HbA1c in
non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients (Table I).
Table I: Simple correlations between HbA1c and
plasma glucose levels at different times of the day in patients with
non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

To this end, they posed the following questions. (1) How frequently do
diabetic patients experience broad glucose excursions after meals? (2) To
what extent does fasting plasma glucose influence subsequent glucose
levels during the day? (3) How strongly are plasma glucose levels at
different times of the day interrelated? (4) Is HbA1c influenced more
strongly by fasting or non-fasting plasma glucose?
HbA1c levels and plasma glucose profiles (samples taken before and 2–3 h
after meals) were measured in three groups of patients: 371 outpatients
measured once daily at the diabetes clinic; 30 patients self-measured at
home five times per day over the course of 1 month; and 455 inpatients
measured on the day of admission to hospital.
After meals many subjects had glucose levels >8.9 mmol/l (160 mg/dl)
and/or glucose excursions >2.2 mmol/l (40 mg/dl) even when their HbA1c
levels were satisfactory (<7%). In the outpatients who attended the clinic
on a daily basis, 67.4% showed exaggerated increases in postmeal plasma
glucose levels (>2.2 mmol/l), whereas in those who performed home glucose
monitoring, 79.0% had exaggerated increases in postmeal plasma glucose;
among inpatients this figure was 64.6%.
Glucose levels at different times of the day in every group showed
significant correlations, but most were not particularly strong.
Coefficients of correlation ranged from 0.52 to 0.88. Multiple regression
analysis revealed that premeal but not postmeal plasma/blood glucose
levels were independent predictors of HbA1c. The results of this study
suggest that:
— the majority of non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients have large
postprandial glucose concentrations and meal-induced glucose excursions;
— glucose levels throughout the day are not as strongly interrelated as
might be expected;
— HbA1c is more dependent on preprandial than on postprandial glucose
levels.
These results also clearly show that a considerable proportion of type 2
diabetic patients with satisfactory HbA1c levels had inadequate
postprandial glucose control and that the drugs at present most frequently
used for treating type 2 diabetes are not able in most cases to prevent
exaggerated postmeal glucose excursions.
Comment
Several recent studies have suggested that hyperglycemia is a major
modifiable risk factor to reduce diabetic complications. Fasting glucose
levels, postchallenge hyperglycemia and even isolated postprandial
hyperglycemia are important factors in the development of atherosclerosis
and fatal coronary heart disease [1, 2]; further, 2-h postprandial glucose
levels are better predictors of mortality from cardiovascular disease than
are fasting blood glucose levels [2]. Some reports have suggested that
raised glucose levels are also accompanied by increased postprandial
hyperlipidemia, which is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular
disease [3, 4].
The loss of early or first-phase insulin release, which is responsible for
the suppression of endogenous postmeal hepatic glucose production (HGP),
plays a major role in postprandial hyperglycemia [4]. In non-diabetic
subjects early insulin release suppresses HGP by 50% within 30 min of a
meal, but in type 2 diabetic patients no suppression occurs until 2 h
after a meal and, moreover, HGP is 50% higher at baseline. The suppression
of HGP by insulin in non-diabetic subjects predominantly results from
insulin’s inhibition of lipolysis in adipose tissue, by which the
decreased delivery of free fatty acids from the fat cells signals to the
liver to suppress HGP [5]. The increased baseline HGP in diabetics is
partly the consequence of adipose tissue insulin resistance and is fuelled
by excess non-esterified fatty acid release from the fat cells. The
chronic increase in circulating free fatty acids also has a detrimental
effect on the islet cells: triglyceride (and long-chain acyl coenzyme A)
concentrations increase within the cells and this ‘lipotoxicity’ induces
progressive impairment in insulin secretion [4].
If the loss of early insulin secretion plays a major role in the
pathogenesis of postprandial hyperglycemia, strategies to augment early
insulin secretion would represent novel therapeutic interventions to
improve glycemic control and to prevent the chronic complications of
diabetes. To achieve this goal we need to answer some basic questions. (1)
Is the restoration of early insulin release able to prevent exaggerated
postmeal glucose excursions? (2) Does the restoration of insulin secretion
have a long-term effect on the progression of diabetes or on the
development of complications? (3) What are the levels of postprandial
hyperglycemia in treated type 2 diabetic patients? (4) Are traditional
hypoglycemic drugs able to improve early insulin secretion?
Several studies (reviewed in [4]) have proved that replacement of the
first-phase insulin peak with an exogenous insulin infusion can suppress
HGP to levels similar to those observed in non-diabetic subjects. Genetic
predisposition limits the ability of the b-cells to compensate for insulin
resistance and is behind several environmental effects such as those of
weight gain, physical inactivity and a high-fat diet. There have been no
prospective clinical studies to establish how long b-cell function could
be preserved with the new types of interventions. We know that by the time
type 2 diabetes becomes manifest b-cell function is already reduced by
about 50%, and the subsequent deterioration of further insulin secretion
is not associated with a change in insulin sensitivity. Interventions
should thus focus on preserving islet function.
From the present and from previous studies [6] it is clear that
conventional parameters such as HbA1c and premeal plasma/blood glucose
levels are inadequate determinants of postchallenge hyperglycemia and the
excess morbidity and mortality that accompany it. As most guidelines
recommend monitoring of HbA1c and premeal glucose levels, evaluation of
glucose control based on measuring postprandial glucose values represents
an attractive target in primary care.
Conventional sulfonylureas augment insulin secretion, but this effect is
not specific to first-phase insulin secretion, since basal and
second-phase insulin secretion are also increased. The new
non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues, repaglinide and nateglinide,
increase early insulin secretion but not basal and second-phase insulin
secretion, and thereby lower postprandial glucose levels without
exhausting b-cell insulin production.
The pulmonary administration of regular insulin and the new rapid-acting
insulin analogues with their more rapid pharmacodynamic profile are
another means of improving glycemic control by a faster and more complete
suppression of endogenous glucose production.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) provides another means of augmenting early
insulin secretion and controlling postprandial glycemia. In clinical
studies, GLP-1 increased insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner
[4].
Last, but not least, diet, physical exercise and weight loss are the most
physiological interventions for improving glycemic control. Weight gain
following exposure to a high-fat diet (50% of calories from fat) causes a
decline in acute insulin secretory response which can largely be reversed
with weight loss. All these effects may be mediated in part through the
effect of increased/decreased non-esterified fatty acids [4].
In conclusion, everyday diabetes care should focus on better glycemic
measures based on postprandial glucose values, as there is strong evidence
that postmeal glucose values predict cardiovascular disease even in the
absence of fasting hyperglycemia. Recent developments in diabetic
pharmacotherapy have produced effective interventions to preferentially
modify postprandial glucose levels.
References
1. Henefeld M, Koehler C, Schaper F et al. Postprandial
plasma glucose is an independent risk factor for increased carotid
intima-media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Atherosclerosis 1999;
144: 229–35.
2. Kuizon D, Gordon SM, Dolmatch BL et al. Glucose tolerance and
cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic
criteria. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 397–405.
3. Agboola-Abu CF, Ohwovoriole AE, Akinlade KS et al. The effect of
glycaemic control on the prevalence and pattern of dyslipidaemia in
Nigerian patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes
mellitus. West Afr J Med 2000; 19: 27–33.
4. Pratley RE, Weyer C. The role of impaired early insulin secretion in
the pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2001; 44:
929–45.
5. Luzi L, deFronzo RA. Effect of loss of first-phase insulin secretion on
hepatic glucose production and tissue glucose disposal in humans. Am J
Physiol 1989; 257: E704–11.
6. Erlinger TP, Brancati FL. Postchallenge hyperglycemia in a national
sample of U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2001; 24: 1734–8.
Summary and Comment:
László Korányi, Balatonfüred, Hungary