CSII in type 1 diabetic children

Back Home Up Next

[left.htm]

CSII in type 1 diabetic children

Original article:
Selection for and initiation of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Proceeding from a workshop.
Hanas R. Horm Res 2002; 57 (suppl 1): 101–4.


Summary
Although continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has been used in children for more than 20 years, the technique is not widespread in most countries. However, there has recently been increasing interest in pump therapy in young children, older children and adolescents. Swedish pediatricians have been particularly involved in initiating pump treatment in children with type 1 diabetes: the figure for CSII use rose from 7.5% in 1999 to 12% in 2002. Today, most pediatric centres in Sweden use pumps. A particular effort in training pediatric teams and, since 1997, reimbursement of the cost of pumps and supplies have helped further the use of the technique.
In this paper, Ragnar Hanas, a specialist in CSII therapy in children in Sweden, presents concise data for the pediatric endocrinologist drawn from his wide experience (37% of the pediatric cohort of Uddevalla are treated by CSII; Fig. 1) and from an analysis of the literature. Table I lists the possible indications for insulin pump therapy in children. The clinical benefits and risks, pump initiation and needle routine are carefully presented.
Dr Hanas concludes that CSII therapy in children and adolescents is feasible, well accepted and can be managed safely.


Fig. 1: Age distribution of children and adolescents using insulin pumps at the Uddevalla Pediatric Clinic.
Table I: Possible indications for using an insulin pump.

Comment
There has been a rapid increase in the number of reports of clinical experience and studies of CSII use in type 1 diabetic children in recent years. These reports have increased our knowledge about the technique and provided evidence for its use in the pediatric population. Recommendations for the most appropriate age ranges are currently available and most are clearly presented in this paper.
At a recent meeting of the American Diabetes Association in June 2001, eight oral communications addressed the question of the benefits of CSII in children. Also in 2001, at a meeting in Siena of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes, a workshop gathered together 100 experienced pediatricians to discuss the topic. All recent papers presented data strongly supporting the successful use of CSII in children and confirming previously published data. In general, glycemic control was improved or remained stable; there was a reduction in the frequency of hypoglycemic events; and a better quality of family life (greater lifestyle flexibility) was achieved.
Guidelines for the transition from multiple daily injections to CSII are different for children and adults, especially prepubertal children. In a recent study [1], a reduction in total insulin dosage was necessary at initiation of pump therapy in pubertal (-18%) but not in prepubertal children, confirming the findings of previous studies in young children. Forty to fifty percent of the daily insulin dose is given as basal rates, but timings of maximum basal rates were found to differ between adults and children. Several studies in prepubertal children using pumps with insulin lispro showed that the maximum basal rate was reached between dinner and midnight. Pediatricians must be aware of this in order to optimize the efficacy of CSII therapy. The number of basal rates is frequently reported to be two or three per 24 h (early night, late night and daytime), whereas Dr Hanas recommends starting with five separate basal rate profiles by adding one basal rate for each main meal. Nevertheless, CSII allows adequate profiles to be tailored to each patient in order to closely match individual insulin needs.
CSII is a more physiological way of insulin delivery, which minimizes unphysiological hyperinsulinemia, especially at night. Nocturnal basal rate adjustment is an essential tool in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in diabetic children, especially in high-risk children below 5 years of age [2]. On the other hand, few data are available on the different methods of mealtime bolus administration in children. A recent paper by Chase et al. [3] studied different methods of bolus administration for a high-calorie, high-
carbohydrate meal (single bolus, two boluses and square-wave) in adults. The lowest prandial blood glucose excursions were observed after dual-wave administration when 70% of the insulin dose was given as a bolus and 30% as a 2-h square-wave.
As Dr Hanas states, in children, small incremental changes in bolus and basal rates are recommended in order to avoid blood glucose fluctuations. Very small changes in boluses and basal rates, such as 0.1 or 0.2 units (per h), are feasible and accurate with a pump, unlike with pens and syringes, and are particularly suited to very young children.
The limits of pump therapy are well known: the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis due to catheter obstruction can be prevented by specific parental education; skin tolerance has considerably improved with the use of Teflon catheters, which can also conveniently be disconnected for bathing or swimming. In order to prevent complications, needles should be removed every 2 [4] to 3 days (Hanas), and testing for urine or blood glucose ketones should be carried out in cases of hyperglycemia. Education of parents and children, and supervision by a specialized pediatric diabetes team are the keys to success of CSII therapy in children. If these are in place, CSII can safely be used in diabetic children.

References
1. Conrad SC, McGrath MT, Gitelman SE. Transition from multiple daily injections to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 235–40.
2. Tubiana-Rufi N, Czernichow P. Special problems and management of the child less than 5 years of age. In: Sperling MA, ed. Type 1 diabetes: etiology and treatment. Minneapolis, MN: Humana Press. In press.
3. Chase HP, Saib SZ, MacKenzie M et al. Post-prandial glucose excursions following four methods of bolus insulin administration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Med 2002; 19: 317–21.
4. Litton J, Rice A, Friedman N et al. Insulin pump therapy in toddlers and preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 490–5.


Summary and Comment:
Nadia Tubiana-Rufi, Paris, France