[left.htm]

PPARγ2 polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy

Original article:
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 polymorphism Pro12Ala is associated with nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. The Berlin Diabetes Mellitus (BeDiaM) study.
Herrmann S-M, Ringel J, Wang J-G, Staessen JA, Brand E. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2653–7.


Summary
Nephropathy associated with type 2 diabetes is a complex trait. The contribution of genetic markers is supported by familial studies. Segregation analyses performed in Pima Indians as well as in Caucasian families are in favour of a monogenic or oligogenic disease. Many candidate genes have been examined. In this report the authors describe the effect of a Pro12Ala polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gene in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
A total of 445 patients (220 men and 225 women) of Caucasian ethnicity with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy were recruited to this German multicentre study. Nephropathy was classified according to urinary albumin excretion (UAE) or the presence of endstage renal failure. The phenotype was very accurately reported with collection of data on coronary artery disease and retinopathy (stages III or IV on funduscopy or a history of laser treatment). Retinopathy was found in 16% of patients; UAE was 24.8 mg/min and 21.8 mg/min in men and women, respectively.
The distribution of the PPARg2 Pro12Ala gene polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Ala12 allele carriers had lower UAE compared with non-carriers (17.1 vs. 25.8 mg/min; p = 0.01). After adjustment for sex, age, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, duration of diabetes and diabetes treatment, Ala12 allele carriers still had lower UAE in comparison with non-carriers. After adjustment, the odds ratio of having proteinuria was 0.66 for Ala12 allele carriers compared with non-carriers (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Odds ratios of having macroalbuminuria in PPARg2 Ala12 allele carriers vs. non-carriers for all patients and subgroups according to duration of diabetes. Vertical lines denote 95% CI. The size of the symbols is proportional to the number of cases given alongside the squares. Number of patients (n) and significance levels for odds ratios (p) and for the interaction (pint) between the genetic polymorphism and duration of diabetes are given.

Interestingly, there was a significant interaction between the Pro12Ala polymorphism and duration of diabetes (Fig. 2). The longer the duration of diabetes, the stronger the protective effect of the Ala12 allele.

Fig. 2: Percentage difference in UAE between PPARg2 Ala12 allele carriers and non-carriers for all patients and for subgroups according to duration of diabetes. Vertical lines denote 95% CI. For each subgroup, the number of subjects is given (bottom). Number of patients (n) and significance levels for the difference (p) and for the interaction (pint) between the genetic polymorphism and duration of diabetes are given.



Comment
The authors examined the effect of a common polymorphism on the incidence of diabetic nephropathy. The role of this polymorphism on the genesis of renal disease might be due to the effect of insulin resistance. In type 1 diabetes, insulin resistance has been recently shown to be higher in patients who eventually progress to proteinuria [1]. However, in the present study, the authors did not measure insulin resistance. They stated that the Pro12Ala polymorphism was a good candidate gene, as treatment
with glitazones could modify the course of diabetic nephropathy.
However, one of the main difficulties with regard to the analysis of this polymorphism is that we do not have any intermediate phenotype. The exact mechanism by which the gene may be involved in diabetic nephropathy is not known. Of interest, Herrmann et al. did not analyse the contribution of the genotype to the different stages of nephropathy but to a continuous trait, namely UAE. However, we do not have any data on the patients with endstage renal failure. As diabetic retinopathy was rarely found, UAE might also be related to non-diabetic renal disease.
The main point in this study is that the positive correlation continued even after adjusting for confounding factors. However, other studies examining the same question have failed to produce such positive results. Additional investigations must therefore be carried out to confirm the risk of nephropathy associated with the PPARγ2 Pro12Ala polymorphism.

Reference
1. Orchard TJ, Chang YF, Ferrell RE et al. Nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: a manifestation of insulin resistance and multiple genetic susceptibilities? Further evidence from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 963–70.

Summary and Comment:
Samy Hadjadj, Poitiers, France